New Amazons Report: Systemic Barriers Keeping Women Out of Environmental Leadership

Exciting news — the Amazons Research Report has just been released!

The publication, “Analysis of Systemic Barriers Preventing Women from Becoming Environmental Leaders,” is a desk-based study exploring the systemic obstacles faced by girls and young women who aspire to lead in the environmental field. These barriers fall into four main categories: structural, institutional, socio-cultural, and symbolic & subjective.

Theoretical Framework

The report draws on several key theoretical perspectives — ecofeminism, intersectionality, transformative leadership, and European institutional gender approaches. Together, these help deepen our understanding of power, access, and representation in environmental decision-making. The analysis is grounded in examples from the countries represented in the project, primarily the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, and Portugal.

Four Dimensions of Systemic Barriers

1. Structural Barriers

  • STEM education gaps: Women make up over 54% of students in Europe but remain underrepresented in STEM areas crucial for the green economy.
  • Occupational segregation: Women are more common in lower-paid or less-prestigious environmental roles, while men dominate engineering, energy, and planning sectors.
  • Unequal access to resources: Women have lower land ownership and fewer opportunities for climate financing.
  • Invisible informal leadership: Women’s community-based initiatives are often overlooked by formal institutions.

2. Institutional Barriers

  • Weak gender mainstreaming: EU strategies often fail to translate into measurable gender indicators in climate budgeting and policy.
  • Bias in recruitment and promotion: Standardized, linear career paths disadvantage women balancing care work or holding non-traditional professional profiles.
  • Rigid organizational norms: Expectations around mobility or availability often conflict with women’s unpaid care responsibilities.
  • Technocratic leadership models: Institutions tend to favor hierarchical and traditionally “masculine” leadership styles.

3. Socio-Cultural Barriers

  • Gender stereotypes associating leadership with masculinity.
  • Care burden: Women still perform most unpaid domestic and care work, limiting time for leadership roles.
  • Microaggressions and symbolic violence, such as interruptions or dismissal of expertise.
  • Lack of role models in media, academia, and public institutions.
  • Intersectional invisibility: Women from marginalized groups face additional layers of exclusion.

4. Symbolic & Subjective Barriers

  • Implicit biases in how female leaders are perceived.
  • Imposter syndrome disproportionately affecting women in male-dominated environmental spaces.
  • Judgment around communication and appearance, reinforcing restrictive norms.
  • Dominant “male expert” archetype, which shapes who is seen as credible.

Positive Trends and Good Practices

Despite the challenges, the report highlights promising developments:

  • Women leaders — such as Spain’s Teresa Ribera — show that environmental leadership can integrate justice, participation, and feminist values.
  • Support networks including Women4Climate, WiRE, and the Global Women’s Assembly for Climate Justice strengthen visibility, knowledge, and advocacy.
  • Digital activism through campaigns like #WomenGreenPT helps amplify women’s voices.
  • Institutional initiatives such as gender-responsive budgeting and funding for women-led climate projects.
  • Educational and grassroots programs, including Erasmus+ initiatives, promote climate leadership skills among young women.

Conclusion

The Amazons report makes one thing clear: women are not underrepresented in environmental leadership because they lack ability or ambition. The barriers are systemic – woven into institutions, culture, and policy. Building a sustainable future requires not only equal opportunities but a new model of leadership built on care, collaboration, inclusivity, and diverse forms of knowledge.

The report offers concrete recommendations — from institutional reforms to community-level support — paving the way toward a more equitable and sustainable Europe.

Read now!


Comments

Leave a comment